Cation exchange capacity (CEC) is a measure of the soil’s ability to hold positively charged ions. It is a very important soil property influencing soil structure stability, nutrient availability, soil pH and the soil’s reaction to fertilisers and other ameliorants (Hazleton and Murphy 2007).
The main ions associated with CEC in soils are the exchangeable cations calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+). A soil’s CEC is critical to the supply of plant nutrients, because many of these cations are also essential for plant growth. That is why, in general terms, soils with high CECs are considered to be more fertile or potentially more fertile.
In most cases, CEC is measured by summing the number of base cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and K+) present on the soil exchange sites (CEC by bases). However, as soils become more acidic, these cations may be replaced by hydrogen (H+), aluminium (Al3+) and manganese (Mn2+). This ‘exchangable acidity’ must also be taken into consideration when measuring CEC in acidic soils. Methods for measuring CEC and exchangeable cations are described in detail by Rayment and Lyons (2011).
CEC is conventionally expressed in milliequivalents of charge per 100 g of soil or meq/100 g. This is numerically equivalent to centimoles of charge per kilogram of soil (cmol+/kg).
Figure 1: Sandy duplex soil, with clay at 40 cm. Note the high CEC of the clay below 40 cm, and the impact of organic matter on the sand’s CEC.
Table 1: Characteristics of low and high CEC soils.
LOW CEC (1 – 10 meq/100 g)
MODERATE TO HIGH CE)
(11 – 50 meq/100 g)
High sand content
Higher clay content
Nutrient leaching like to be a problem
Greater capacity to retain nutrients against leaching
Low water holding capacity
Higher water holding capacity
Low capacity to resist changes to soil pH
Greater capcity to resist changes to soil pH
A soil with a high CEC will generally be more fertile than one with a low CEC. However, it should be noted that once the nutrient reserves or ability of a high CEC soil to resist acidification have been exhausted, high rates of fertiliser or lime will be required to restore soil fertility.
If clay content is known, and organic matter is low or removed before measuring CEC, CEC values can also be used to infer the type of clay minerals present in the soil (table 2). Clay mineral types can strongly influence many soil properties, such as:
•Their water holding capacity—soil dominant in smectite minerals can hold more water than those dominant in kaolinite.
•Their ability to shrink and swell on wetting and drying—a characteristic of smectitic soils.
•Their fertility—clays containing smectite, vermiculite, illite and mica minerals tend to produce highly fertile soils and have a constant CEC regardless of pH.
Table 2: Relationship between the clay:CEC ratio and the clay mineral composition of a soil (Shaw et al. 1998).
0.2 – 0.35
Illite and kaolinite
0.35 – 0.55
Mixed clay mineralogies
0.55 – 0.75
Mixed clay mineralogies with a higher proportion of smectite
0.75 – 0.95
Dominantly smectite with the possibility of feldspars
Smectite, plus feldspars or CEC from other than the clay fraction (e.g. organic matter)
For many soils, CEC remains the same regardless of soil pH. However, some highly weathered soils vary their CEC as pH changes. The ferrosol soils common in the inland Burnett region are an example of this type of soil. As soil pH decreases these soils become positively rather than negatively charged and can start to attract negatively charged anions such as sulphate, phosphate and nitrate. For variable charge soils like these, proper management of pH and the maintenance of soil organic matter is crucial in order to provide sufficient amounts of the nutrient cations. The lower the CEC of a soil, the faster the soil pH will decrease with time. Liming soils, increasing soil organic matter, and ensuring the appropriate use of nitrogen fertilisers can help maintain exchangeable plant nutrient cations in these soils (see Soil Acidity—Queensland fact sheet).
Cornell University Cooperative Extension (CUCE) (2007) Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). Agronomy Fact Sheet Series # 22. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University.
Hazelton PA, Murphy BW (2007) Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All The Numbers Mean?. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.
McKenzie NJ, Jacquier DJ, Isbell RF, Brown KL (2004) Australian Soils and Landscapes: An Illustrated Compendium. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Victoria.
Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Electrical Conductivity. In ‘Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical
Methods’ Inkata Press: Melbourne.
Rengasamy P, Churchman GJ (1999) Cation Exchange Capacity, Exchangeable Cations and Sodicity. In Soil Analysis an
Interpretation Manual. (Eds KI Peverill, LA Sparrow and DJ Reuter). CSIRO: Melbourne.
Shaw RJ, Coughlan KJ & Bell LC (1998) ‘Root zone sodicity’, in eds ME Sumner & R Naidu, Sodic soils: Distribution, properties, management, and environmental consequences, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 95–106.
The National Soil Quality Monitoring Program is being funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, as part of the second Soil Biology Initiative.
The participating organisations accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it.